Edward D. Lanquist and Benjamin West Janke of Baker Donelson examine 2025 copyright decisions addressing AI training and fair use, highlighting judicial concerns over piracy and market harm.

U.S. justices leave human authorship rule intact, reinforcing legal limits on AI intellectual property claims.

Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Sadly, copyright and AI are something of a mess. The race to develop the most advanced AI models shows no sign of slowing anytime ...

The Trump administration has unveiled an ambitious blueprint for U.S. dominance of artificial intelligence, outlining actions to accelerate innovation, build infrastructure and lead internationally.

In 2025, U.S. courts issued the first substantive, merits-stage decisions addressing whether the use of copyrighted works to train generative artificial intelligence systems constitutes "fair use." ...

A Long-Running AI Copyright Question Gets an Answer as Supreme Court Stays Mum ...

Cox Communications was sued for copyright infringement by Sony Music and other labels on behalf of their artists. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the $1 billion judgment against Cox, ...

In a significant decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently ruled that the Copyright Act of 1976 requires human authorship to register ...

The head of the US copyright office has been fired by President Trump just a few days after publishing a report that said AI often breaches copyright law. Questions about the legality of AI in terms ...

Small digital creators are allegedly struggling to defend their trademarks and content against other companies and creators over what they say are dated laws governing digital entrepreneurship, ...