Debating anti-evolutionists is something of a fool’s errand, which makes me something of a fool, especially if you read the reviews of my recent debate with America’s leading intelligent design ...

"Intelligent design" is vastly similar to creationism and should be taught as religion, not science, a Catholic theologian testified Friday, on the fifth day of a trial over whether the concept ...

A good number of scientists from various scientific fields are discovering astonishing evidence that strongly supports intelligent design. According to the April 1999 issue of Insight magazine, ...

U.S. District Court Judge John E. Jones III presided over the landmark case of Kitzmiller v. Dover. It was one of the most significant battles in the cultural war over teaching evolution in U.S.

Nov. 9, 2005 — -- Intelligent design, the idea that life was designed by a higher power, is dividing communities across the country. In Tuesday's election, voters in Dover, Pa., removed from ...

A federal judge, saying “intelligent design” is “an interesting theological argument, but ... not science,” ruled Tuesday that a school board violated the Constitution by compelling biology teachers ...

Last time, we noted the surprising fact that Thomist fans of the Argument from Design and partisans of Intelligent Design don’t see eye to eye. This confuses many people, who ask the very reasonable ...

Over the years the scientific community has largely decided not to take part in public debates over creationism v. evolution. Now they're being careful about how they take on Darwin's latest critics — ...

Why can't intelligent design include evolution? originally appeared on Quora: the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world. Answer by ...

Evolution prevailed over "intelligent design" in a courtroom contest of survival of the fittest. In a remarkably stinging decision, a federal judge ruled Tuesday that intelligent design is not science ...